跳至內容

能量醫學

維基百科,自由的百科全書

能量醫學是使用能量的補充和替代醫學領域,例如電療、磁療、手法治療和遠程治療。它也被稱為能量療法。待處理的「能量」包括科學證明存在的能量(電能、磁能、光能)、非科學能量(靈氣、信仰)和傳統概念(氣功跟經絡)[1]

不過能量醫學在部分臨床研究上沒有顯著療效[2][3][4][5][6][7]。能量醫學的理論基礎被醫學專業人士批評為不可信 [8][9][10][11];一些支持能量醫學的研究結果被醫學專業人士指責為含有方法上的缺陷[12][13][14]和選擇上的偏見 [12][13],而所謂的治療結果被認定為是由已知的心理機制(安慰劑效應)造成的[13][12] 。而推銷 "能量醫學 "產品的人往往會被認為是在詐騙[15][15]

參考文獻

  1. ^ Network newsletter. Energy Medicines: Will East Meet West?. 2007 [November 30, 2010]. (原始內容存檔於November 25, 2010). 
  2. ^ Hall, Harriet. Faith Healing. sciencebasedmedicine.org. 26 January 2010 [February 29, 2020]. (原始內容存檔於2020-11-13). ...When faith healings have been diligently investigated by qualified doctors, they have found no evidence that the patients were actually helped in any objective sense. Even at Lourdes, the Catholic Church has only recognized 4 cures since 1978, out of 5 million people who seek healing there every year. There simply is no evidence that faith healing heals. Not what science considers evidence. And the true believers don't value evidence or the scientific method: for them, belief is enough. 
  3. ^ Abbot, NC; Harkness, EF; Stevinson, C; Marshall, FP; Conn, DA; Ernst, E. Spiritual healing as a therapy for chronic pain: a randomized, clinical trial. Pain. 2001, 91 (1–2): 79–89. PMID 11240080. doi:10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00421-8. 
  4. ^ Ernst E. Distant healing—an update of a systematic review. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. April 30, 2003, 115 (7–8): 241–245. PMID 12778776. doi:10.1007/BF03040322. Since the publication of our previous systematic review in 2000, several rigorous new studies have emerged. Collectively they shift the weight of the evidence against the notion that distant healing is more than a placebo. 
  5. ^ Ernst E. Spiritual healing: more than meets the eye. J Pain Symptom Manage. November 2006, 32 (5): 393–5 [2021-12-14]. PMID 17085260. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.07.010. (原始內容存檔於2020-05-12). 
  6. ^ Pittler, MH; Ernst, E. Complementary Therapies for Neuropathic and Neuralgic Pain: Systematic Review. Clinical Journal of Pain. 2008, 24 (8): 731–733. PMID 18806539. doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181759231. 
  7. ^ Singh, S; Ernst, E. Trick or Treatment. W. W. Norton & Company. 2008: 324. 
  8. ^ Richard Gist; Bernard Lubin. Response to disaster: psychosocial, community, and ecological approaches in clinical and community psychology. Psychology Press. 1999: 291. ISBN 978-0-87630-998-8. 
  9. ^ Stephen Barrett. Some Notes on the American Academy of Quantum Medicine (AAQM). [2021-12-14]. (原始內容存檔於2018-10-27). 
  10. ^ Stenger, Victor J. The Physics of 'Alternative Medicine': Bioenergetic Fields. The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine. 1999, 3 (1): 16–21. (原始內容存檔於May 8, 2016). 
  11. ^ Eduard Kruglyakov. What threat does pseudoscience pose to society?. Social Sciences. September 30, 2004, 3 (3): 74–88 [2021-12-14]. (原始內容存檔於2021-12-14). 
  12. ^ 12.0 12.1 12.2 McCaslin DL. A review of efficacy claims in energy psychology. Psychotherapy. June 2009, 46 (2): 249–56. PMID 22122622. doi:10.1037/a0016025. 
  13. ^ 13.0 13.1 13.2 Pignotti, M.; Thyer, B. Some comments on "Energy psychology: A review of the evidence": Premature conclusions based on incomplete evidence?. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2009, 46 (2): 257–261. PMID 22122623. doi:10.1037/a0016027. 
  14. ^ Agdal, R; von b Hjelmborg, J; Johannessen, H. Energy healing for cancer: A critical review. Forschende Komplementärmedizin. 2011, 18 (3): 146–54. PMID 21701183. doi:10.1159/000329316. 
  15. ^ 15.0 15.1 Michael J. Berens; Christine Willmsen. Miracle Machines:The 21st-Century Snake Oil. 西雅圖時報. [2007-11-18]. (原始內容存檔於November 20, 2007).