使用者:Jsjsjs1111/analysis
THE CHARISMA OF MARTYRDOMI stopped doing systematic fieldwork among Falun Gong practitioners in late 2002, in large measure because of the increasing pressure placed on me by practitioners to play a role in their struggle against the Chinese state. As Falun Gong multiplied its websites and media outlets— New Tang Dynasty Television and The Epoch Times newspaper being the most important—it was to be expected that they seek out the opinions of academic authorities to try to make their case. At the same time, despite my sympathy for the plight of Falun Gong practitioners, it became impossible to deliver any sort of nuanced message through Falun Gong media, or even to have meaningful conversations with many Falun Gong practitioners whose worldview had become increasingly dualistic. Many practitioners also became insistent and almost paranoid, adopting an 「us against them」 mentality which makes interaction with them unpleasant and unproductive, and which, unfortunately, confirms the suspicions of those who all along saw them as a cult. This was rarely the case when I was doing fieldwork between 1999 and 2002.
Unwilling to become the Falun Gong pet expert, or to joust with practitioners as adversaries, as do most journalists, I simply decided to distance myself from them.
— --David Ownby, 2008
這個分析模仿了en:User:Ohconfucius的用戶子頁面(en:User:Ohconfucius/essay/rant_about_Falun_Gong_pages),對中文維基百科上的輪子進行分析。目前正在施工中……
“ | I am no fan of the Chinese Communist Party, the media censorship it practices, nor its human rights record, but the Epoch Times appears often to carry stories and allegations that no other respectable journal will confirm or even hint at. | ” |
“ | Propaganda violates the main tenets of wikipedia, and should be deleted on sight. The FG articles are littered with copyright violations of propaganda and other stuff which makes no sense to mere mortals, yet the FG articles are filled with more and more of these. There are some editors of FG who do not work on any other articles, and don't seem to care what the rules are. WTF is good faith? | ” |
——en:User:Ohconfucius |
List of Falun Gong editors
"Narrow spectrum"
- Elegance(討論 | 貢獻) – made personal attacks, indefinitely blocked
- AICIA(討論 | 貢獻) – inactive
- m(討論 | 貢獻) – has been blocked for many times, starts voting in DYKs recently
- sh(討論 | 貢獻) – more active in discussions rather than articles, starts voting in DYKs recently
- r(討論 | 貢獻) – has made few edits
- l(討論 | 貢獻) – strong POV pushing in both articles and discussions
- t(討論 | 貢獻) – only participates in AFD discussions recently
- x(討論 | 貢獻) – inactive, has made few edits, participates immediately after becoming autoconfirmed
- s(討論 | 貢獻) – is changing to "Wide spectrum", starts voting a lot in DYKs recently
- t2(討論 | 貢獻)
- j(討論 | 貢獻)
- g(討論 | 貢獻)
- g2(討論 | 貢獻) – strong POV pushing without dicussion
Note: most of the above make few edits outside of Falun Gong-related articles and discussions, especially those in bold
"Wide spectrum"
- Moonlightwalker(討論 | 貢獻) – inactive
- We(討論 | 貢獻) – very active recently, "civil POV pusher", lots of propagandas in discussions, starts voting a lot in DYKs recently, might be a sockpuppet of user Moonlightwalker
List of Editors with strong pro-FLG opinions (however probably not FLG practitioners)
- 語妙天下2(討論 | 貢獻) – indefinitely blocked, very rude and aggressive, use sockpuppets on edit wars, attacks Wikipedia on facebook
- W2(討論 | 貢獻) –
- T(討論 | 貢獻) –
- C(討論 | 貢獻)
- H(討論 | 貢獻)
Notable incidents
- Wikipedia:頁面存廢討論/記錄/2012/12/19#Wikipedia:發正念: m, sh, we, t, g, s all voted Delete in this dicussion. Only two other Delete votes exists.