建构效度
 | 此条目可参照英语维基百科相应条目来扩充。 |
建构效度（英语：Construct validity），也称概念效度，为一个建构或概念的有效度，指的是一个测验实际测验其宣称或标榜要测验的项目的程度。[1][2][3]在古典的测验效度模型中，建构效度、内容效度与效标效度并列为三个主要的效度验证（validity evidence）统计法。[4][5]现代的“有效度理论”把建构效度视为效度研究之宗，因为建构效度概括了其他效度验证类型。[6][7]
文献来源
- ^ Brown, J. D. Testing in language programs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents. 1996 [2018-08-28]. （原始内容存档于2017-05-17）.
- ^ Cronbach, L. J.; Meehl, P.E. Construct Validity in Psychological Tests. Psychological Bulletin. 1955, 52 (4): 281–302. [2018-08-28]. PMID 13245896. doi:10.1037/h0040957. （原始内容存档于2019-04-10）.
- ^ Polit DF Beck CT (2012). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice, 9th ed. Philadelphia, USA: Wolters Klower Health, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- ^ Guion, R. M. On trinitarian doctrines of validity. Professional Psychology. 1980, 11: 385–398. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.11.3.385.
- ^ Brown, J. D. Testing in language programs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents. 1996.
- ^ Messick, S. Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist. 1995, 50: 741–749. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.9.741.
- ^ Schotte, C. K. W.; Maes, M.; Cluydts, R.; De Doncker, D.; Cosyns, P. Construct validity of the Beck Depression Inventory in a depressive population. Journal of Affective Disorders. 1997, 46 (2): 115–125. doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(97)00094-3.