顺势疗法 (期刊)
Homeopathy | |
学科 | 顺势疗法 |
---|---|
语言 | 英语 |
出版信息 | |
曾用名 | 英国顺势疗法期刊(British Homoeopathic Journal) |
出版历史 | 1911年至今 |
出版者 | |
发行周期 | 每季 |
影响因子 | 1.704(2019年) |
标准缩写 | |
ISO 4 | Homeopathy |
索引 | |
ISSN | 1475-4916(印刷) 1476-4245(在线) |
LCCN | 2002243387 |
OCLC 编号 | 49958024 |
链接 | |
《顺势疗法》(英语:Homeopathy)是一部同行评审医学期刊,涵盖顺势疗法(替代医学的一种伪科学[1][2][3][4]形式)各方面的研究、评论与争论。该期刊是顺势疗法学院(总部设于伦敦)的官方期刊。该期刊于1911年,以《英国顺势疗法期刊》(British Homeopathic Journal)之名创立,乃从合并《英国顺势疗法评论》(British Homoeopathic Review)及《英国顺势疗法学会期刊》(Journal of the British Homoeopathic Society)两部期刊而成。[5][6]2001年,该期刊改名为现称,[7]而现任总编辑为彼得·费舍尔。该期刊起初由自然出版集团出版,[8]及后改由爱思唯尔出版。爱思唯尔出版该期刊的决定受到质疑,皆因顺势疗法被证明无效且不科学。[9]时任爱思唯尔全球企业关系副总裁托马斯·雷勒(Thomas Reller)为该公司出版该期刊的决定作辩护,声称“我们支持就这个主题进行辩论”。[10]2018年起,该期刊改由蒂姆医学出版社出版。[11]
摘要与索引
下列平台有为该期刊提供摘要及编索引:
- CINAHL
- 现期期刊目次/临床医学(Clinical Medicine)[12]
- Embase/Excerpta Medica[13]
- 医学索引/MEDLINE/PubMed[5]
- 科学引文索引[12]
- Scopus[14]
据《期刊引证报告》指出,该期刊于2019年的影响因子为1.704。[15]2015年,由于出现过度自我引用的情况,该期刊的影响因子并没有予以公布。[9]
参考资料
- ^ Tuomela, R. Chapter 4: Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience. Pitt JC, Marcello P (编). Rational Changes in Science: Essays on Scientific Reasoning. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 98. Springer. 1987: 83–101. ISBN 978-94-010-8181-8. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3779-6_4.
- ^ Smith K. Homeopathy is Unscientific and Unethical. Bioethics. 2012, 26 (9): 508–12 [2022-05-01]. S2CID 143067523. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01956.x. (原始内容存档于2017-10-29).
- ^ Baran GR, Kiana MF, Samuel SP. Chapter 2: Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How Do They Differ?. Healthcare and Biomedical Technology in the 21st Century. Springer. 2014: 19–57. ISBN 978-1-4614-8540-7. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8541-4_2.
within the traditional medical community it is considered to be quackery
- ^ Ladyman J. Chapter 3: Towards a Demarcation of Science from Pseudoscience. Pigliucci M, Boudry M (编). Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. 2013: 48–49. ISBN 978-0-226-05196-3.
Yet homeopathy is a paradigmatic example of pseudoscience. It is neither simply bad science nor science fraud, but rather profoundly departs from scientific method and theories while being described as scientific by some of its adherents (often sincerely).
- ^ 5.0 5.1 British Homoeopathic Journal. NLM Catalog. National Center for Biotechnology Information. [2014-01-30]. (原始内容存档于2014-02-02) (美国英语).
- ^ Homeopathy: the journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy. Library of Congress Catalog. Library of Congress. [2014-01-30].
- ^ Fisher, P. Our new title: Homeopathy. British Homoeopathic Journal. 2001, 90 (4): 177. doi:10.1054/homp.1999.0512.
- ^ Academic Journals formerly published by NPG. Nature Publishing Group. [2014-01-28]. (原始内容存档于2019-08-10) (英语).
- ^ 9.0 9.1 Oransky, Ivan; Marcus, Adam. Does a journal of homeopathy belong in science?. STAT. 2016-06-17 [2022-05-02]. (原始内容存档于2017-02-12) (英语).
- ^ Vox, Ford. Why Is This Company Selling a Toxin For Children?. The Daily Beast. 2017-02-24 [2018-01-19] (英语).
- ^ Fisher, Peter. A New Publisher and New Directions. Homeopathy. 2018, 107 (2): 079–080. PMID 29681026. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1646778.
- ^ 12.0 12.1 Master Journal List. Intellectual Property & Science. Clarivate Analytics. [2017-02-11]. (原始内容存档于2017-09-26) (英语).
- ^ Embase Coverage. Embase. Elsevier. [2017-02-11]. (原始内容存档于2015-08-06) (英语).
- ^ Source details: Homeopathy. Scopus preview. Elsevier. [2017-02-11] (英语).
- ^ Homeopathy. 2019 Journal Citation Reports. Web of Science Science. Clarivate Analytics. 2020.