美国共和党派系
此条目可参照英语维基百科相应条目来扩充。 (2024年2月15日) |
美国的共和党包括多个政治派系。19世纪,美国共和党的派系包括:混血儿派,他们支持进行公务员制度改革;激进派,他们支持废除美国的奴隶制度,后来在重建时期亦倡导给予被解放奴隶平等的公民权;坚定派,他们支持机械政治。进入20世纪后,共和党的派系分化为进步派(Progressive Republicans)、里根派和洛克菲勒派。而在21世纪,美国共和党的派系主要由保守派(在国会以共和党研究委员会和自由核心小组为代表)、温和派(在国会以共和党治理集团及问题解决者核心小组中的共和党员为代表)和自由派(在国会以共和党自由核心小组为代表)组成。在唐纳德·特朗普担任美国总统期间,共和党又分裂出特朗普派和反特朗普派。
现有主要派系
在贝拉克·奥巴马担任美国总统期间,美国共和党经历了一场其统治阶级(即共和党建制派)与信奉反建制和小政府主义的茶党运动之间的内讧。[1][2][3][4] 2012年,《纽约时报》将共和党划分为六个派系:大街选民派(Main Street Voters)、茶党选民派(Tea Party Voters)、基督教保守派(Christian Conservatives)、自由派(Libertarians)、不满派(The Disaffected)和濒危 / 消失派(Endangered / Vanished)。[5] 2014年,皮尤研究中心将倾向于共和党的选民分为三个派系:坚定保守派(Steadfast Conservatives)、商业保守派(Business Conservatives)和年轻局外派(Young Outsiders)。[6] 2019年,在唐纳德·特朗普担任美国总统期间,538网的小佩利·培根(Perry Bacon Jr.)断言共和党将分类成五个派系:特朗普派、支持特朗普派、对特朗普持怀疑态度的保守派、对特朗普持怀疑态度的温和派和反特朗普派。[7]
2021年2月,在唐纳德·特朗普败选给乔·拜登及国会山骚乱之后,《华盛顿邮报》的菲利普·邦普(Philip Bump)认为当时的共和党众议员已经分裂成特朗普派(该派系反对第二次弹劾特朗普和剥夺玛乔丽·泰勒·格林自由核心小组成员资格及推翻2020年总统选举结果)、问责核心小组派(该派系支持第二次弹劾特朗普和 / 或剥夺玛乔丽·泰勒·格林自由核心小组成员资格)和亲民主共和党人派(该派系既反对第二次弹劾特朗普和剥夺玛乔丽·泰勒·格林自由核心小组成员资格但也反对推翻2020年总统选举结果)。[8] 同一时期,《达拉斯晨报》的卡尔·洛布斯多夫(Carl Leubsdorf)也认定共和党人分为三种类别:从不支持特朗普派(包括比尔·克里斯托、参议员米特·罗姆尼及州长查利·贝克和拉里·霍甘等)、有时支持特朗普派(包括参议院少数党领袖米奇·麦康奈尔和常驻联合国代表妮基·黑利等)、始终支持特朗普派(包括参议员特德·克鲁兹和乔希·霍利等)。[9]
2021年3月,根据一份民意调查报告显示,在特朗普当选总统后,支持共和党的选民中分化出五个派系:永绝特朗普派、后特朗普派(喜欢特朗普但不希望他再次参选)、支持特朗普派(喜欢特朗普但更认同共和党而非特朗普本人)、特朗普死忠派和共和党信息战派(认同阴谋论者)。[10] 同年11月,皮尤研究中心的一份调查显示有四类美国人群会与共和党结盟,他们分别是:信仰与旗帜保守派(Faith and Flag Conservatives)、坚定保守派(Committed Conservatives)、民粹右派(Populist Right)和矛盾右派(Ambivalent Right)。[11][12]
截至2023年,国会共和党议员将众议院内的共和党派系称为“五大家族”。[13][14][15][16] “五大家族”的概念源自电影《教父》,特指美国黑手党犯罪家族。[14] 而美国众议院内的共和党“五大家族”指的是代表众议院右翼的自由核心小组、代表保守派的共和党研究委员会、代表商人利益的主街核心小组(Main Street Caucus)、代表主流共和党人的共和党治理集团以及跨党派问题解决者核心小组中的共和党议员。需要注意的是,这些派系中的成员相互重叠。[15]
特朗普派
特朗普派(有时被称为MAGA或“美国优先”运动)[17][18]是截至2024年,共和党当今的主流派系。[19][20][21][22][23]它被描述为由一系列右翼意识形态组成,包括但不限于右翼民粹主义[24][25][26]、民族保守主义[27] 、新民族主义[28]、和与唐纳德·特朗普及其支持者有关的政治运动。[29][30]有一些评论家将他们描述为美国政治上的“极右派”。[31][32][33]
在国际关系中,特朗普主义者支持美国援助以色列,但不支持乌克兰[34][35],普遍支持俄罗斯[36][37],并支持孤立主义的“美国优先”外交政策议程。[38][39][40][41]他们普遍拒绝党内和与民主党的妥协[42][43],并愿意驱逐他们认为过于温和的共和党官员。[44][45]与其他共和党人相比,特朗普派更有可能是移民限制主义者[46],并且反对自由贸易[47] 、新保守主义[48]和环境保护主义。[49]
共和党的特朗普主义随着2010年代和2020年代全球极右运动的增加而出现[50][51],也被描述为“极右派”的茶党运动崛起亦推动了特朗普主义。[52] 2016年总统选举特朗普首次当选美国总统后,该党主要分裂为支持特朗普和反对特朗普两派。[53][54]特朗普在2020年连任败选和在2024年再次胜选后,特朗普派在共和党中已越来越占主导地位。
保守派
美国现代保守主义诞生于1950年代到1960年代之间,最初的领导人包括共和党参议员罗伯特·塔夫脱、罗素·柯克和小威廉·巴克利等人。其核心宗旨包括促进个人自由和自由市场经济,同时反对工会、高税负及政府监管。[56]
在经济政策方面,保守派呼吁大幅度削减政府开支、减少对经济的监管以及改变或私有化社会保障。供给面学派和新自由主义的支持者占据着主流地位,但是财政保守主义、赤字鹰派和贸易保护主义等思潮在共和党内也不乏支持者。1930年之前,共和党内东北部支持制造业的派系曾坚定要求提高关税;而在唐纳德·特朗普担任美国总统期间,这一立场在许多保守派圈子内又重新流行起来。[57][58] 保守派通常持社会保守主义立场,他们支持持枪权并限制堕胎权;但是这些问题在共和党内有诸多观点。[59]
保守派普遍反对平权运动,但支持增大军费开支和反对控枪。而在学券议题上,共和党保守派分裂成了两个阵营。支持者相信“大政府教育是失败的”;而反对者则担心政府趁机加强对私立学校和教会学校的控制。部分共和党保守派因为反环保主义或否认气候变化而否定普遍科学共识,[60][61][62][63][64][65] 这使得他们遭致批评;并且他们的这种行为在全球保守派政党中也独树一帜。[65]
在特朗普当选总统后,保守派思想的长期转变被描述为传统保守主义意识形态与右翼民粹主义主题相结合的“新融合主义”。[66] 这些转变导致保守派越来越倾向民族保守主义、贸易保护主义、文化保守主义,支持更现实的外交政策和对新保守主义的否定,同时减少回滚权利计划的努力以及对传统制衡的蔑视。[66][67][68]
基督教右派
自由意志派
新保守派
温和派(反特朗普派)
国会核心小组
选举年 | 共和党研究委员会 (主流) |
自由核心小组 (主流) |
共和党治理集团 | 问题解决者核心小组 | 共和党大街核心小组 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
政治立场 | 中间偏右至右翼 | 右翼至极右翼 | 中间偏右至右翼 | 中间 | 中间 |
2020年 | 157 / 213
|
44 / 213
|
45 / 213
|
28 / 213
|
0 / 213
|
2022年 | 173 / 222
|
45 / 222
|
42 / 222
|
29 / 222
|
67 / 222
|
2024年 | 177 / 220
|
38 / 220
|
41 / 220
|
27 / 220
|
73 / 220
|
重要历史派系
相关条目
参考资料
- ^ Republicans and Tea Party Activists in 'Full Scale Civil War'. ABC新闻. 2013-12-13 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2023-12-06).
- ^ Don Gonyea. GOP Establishment Grapples With A Tea Party That Won't Budge. 全国公共广播电台. 2013-10-02 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2015-09-14).
- ^ Alan I. Abramowitz. Not Their Cup of Tea: The Republican Establishment versus the Tea Party. Center for Politics. 2013-11-14 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2013-11-16).
- ^ Establishment Vs. Tea Party in Primary Showdowns. CBS新闻. 2010-09-14 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2022-01-17).
- ^ A New Guide to the Republican Herd. 纽约时报. 2012-08-26 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2023-05-17).
- ^ Beyond Red vs. Blue: The Political Typology. 皮尤研究中心. 2014-06-26 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2022-11-04).
- ^ Perry Bacon Jr. The Five Wings Of The Republican Party. FiveThirtyEight. 2019-05-27 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2023-09-23).
- ^ Philip Bump. The three factions of House Republicans. 华盛顿邮报. 2021-02-05 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2021-02-09).
- ^ Carl P. Leubsdorf. The GOP is divided into 3 warring factions focused on Trump: Never, Sometimes and Always. Dallas News. The Dallas Morning News. 2021-02-18 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2023-01-23).
- ^ Maggie Haberman. A survey of Republicans shows 5 factions have emerged after Trump’s presidency.. 纽约时报. 2021-03-12 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2023-01-28).
- ^ The Republican coalition - Beyond Red Vs. Blue: The Political Typology. 皮尤研究中心. 2021-11-09 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2024-03-01).
- ^ 分裂的美国:皮尤报告揭示美国公众的九大政治类型. 澎湃新闻. 2021-11-25 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2024-02-16).
- ^ Adrian Blanco; Marianna Sotomayor; Hannah Dormido. Meet ‘the five families’ that wield power in McCarthy’s House majority. 华盛顿邮报. 2023-04-17 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2023-06-08).
- ^ 14.0 14.1 Emily Wilkins. McCarthy Turns to ‘Five Families’ to Keep Peace Among GOP Rivals. Bloomberg Government. 2023-02-28 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2023-12-08).
- ^ 15.0 15.1 Luke Broadwater. ‘5 Families’ and Factions Within Factions: Why the House G.O.P. Can’t Unite. 纽约时报. 2023-10-23 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2023-10-27).
- ^ Manu Raju; Melanie Zanona. Kevin McCarthy leans on ‘five families’ as House GOP plots debt-limit tactics. CNN. 2023-02-13 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2024-03-09).
- ^ Panel Study of the MAGA Movement. University of Washington. January 6, 2021 [March 24, 2024]. (原始内容存档于2024-03-24).
- ^ Gabbatt, Adam; Smith, David. 'America First 2.0': Vivek Ramaswamy pitches to be Republicans' next Trump. the Guardian. August 19, 2023 [March 24, 2024].
- ^ Ball, Molly. The GOP Wants Pure, Uncut Trumpism. The Wall Street Journal. January 23, 2024 [February 22, 2024]. (原始内容存档于January 24, 2024).
- ^ Biebricher, Thomas. The Crisis of American Conservatism in Historical–Comparative Perspective. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. October 25, 2023, 65 (2): 233–259. ISSN 2075-4698. doi:10.1007/s11615-023-00501-2 (英语).
- ^ Arhin, Kofi; Stockemer, Daniel; Normandin, Marie-Soleil. THE REPUBLICAN TRUMP VOTER: A Populist Radical Right Voter Like Any Other?. World Affairs. May 29, 2023, 186 (3). ISSN 1940-1582. doi:10.1177/0043820023117681 (不活跃 November 1, 2024) (英语).
In this article, we first illustrate that the Republican Party, or at least the dominant wing, which supports or tolerates Donald Trump and his Make America Great Again (MAGA) agenda have become a proto-typical populist radical right-wing party (PRRP).
- ^ Desiderio, Andrew; Sherman, Jake; Bresnahan, John. The end of the Old GOP. Punchbowl News. February 7, 2024 [February 8, 2024]. (原始内容存档于February 7, 2024) (美国英语).
- ^ Aratani, Lauren. Republicans unveil two minimum wage bills in response to Democrats' push. The Guardian. 26 February 2021 [7 September 2021]. (原始内容存档于14 August 2021).
In keeping with the party's deep division between its dominant Trumpist faction and its more traditionalist party elites, the twin responses seem aimed at appealing on one hand to its corporate-friendly allies and on the other hand to its populist rightwing base. Both have an anti-immigrant element.
- ^ Campani, Giovanna; Fabelo Concepción, Sunamis; Rodriguez Soler, Angel; Sánchez Savín, Claudia. The Rise of Donald Trump Right-Wing Populism in the United States: Middle American Radicalism and Anti-Immigration Discourse. Societies. December 2022, 12 (6): 154. ISSN 2075-4698. doi:10.3390/soc12060154 (英语).
- ^ Norris, Pippa. Measuring populism worldwide. Party Politics. November 2020, 26 (6): 697–717. ISSN 1354-0688. S2CID 216298689. doi:10.1177/1354068820927686 (英语).
- ^ Cassidy, John. Donald Trump is Transforming the G.O.P. Into a Populist, Nativist Party. The New Yorker. February 29, 2016 [July 22, 2016]. (原始内容存档于March 4, 2016).
- ^ "National conservatives" are forging a global front against liberalism. The Economist (London). February 15, 2024. (原始内容存档于February 20, 2024).
- ^ Zhou, Shaoqing. The origins, characteristics and trends of neo-nationalism in the 21st century. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology. December 8, 2022, 6 (1): 18. PMC 9735003 . PMID 36532330. doi:10.1186/s41257-022-00079-4 .
On a practical level, the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union and Trump's election as the United States president are regarded as typical events of neo-nationalism.
- ^ Katzenstein, Peter J. Trumpism is US. WZB | Berlin Social Science Center. 20 March 2019 [11 September 2021]. (原始内容存档于2021-02-15).
- ^ DiSalvo, Daniel. Party Factions and American Politics. National Affairs. Fall 2022 [April 11, 2023]. (原始内容存档于March 23, 2023). 参数
|journal=
与模板{{cite magazine}}
不匹配(建议改用{{cite journal}}
或|magazine=
) (帮助) - ^ Lowndes, Joseph. Populism and race in the United States from George Wallace to Donald Trump. de la Torre, Carlos (编). Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. London & New York: Routledge. 2019. "Trumpism" section, pp. 197–200 [2024-11-13]. ISBN 978-1315226446. (原始内容存档于2024-05-01).
Trump unabashedly employed the language of white supremacy and misogyny, rage and even violence at Trump rallies was like nothing seen in decades.
- ^ Bennhold, Katrin. Trump Emerges as Inspiration for Germany's Far Right. The New York Times. September 7, 2020 [November 20, 2020]. (原始内容存档于November 20, 2020).
- ^ Gardner, J.A.; Charles, G.U. Election Law in the American Political System. Aspen Casebook Series. Aspen Publishing. 2023: 31 [2023-12-31]. ISBN 978-1-5438-2683-8.
- ^ Falk, Thomas O. Why are US Republicans pushing for aid to Israel but not Ukraine?. Al Jazeera. 2023-11-08 [2023-12-31]. (原始内容存档于2023-12-31).
- ^ Riccardi, Nicholas. Stalled US aid for Ukraine underscores GOP's shift away from confronting Russia. Associated Press. February 19, 2024 [February 28, 2024]. (原始内容存档于2024-02-28).
- ^ Lillis, Mike. GOP strained by Trump-influenced shift from Reagan on Russia. The Hill. February 28, 2024 [February 28, 2024]. (原始内容存档于February 28, 2024).
Experts say a variety of factors have led to the GOP's more lenient approach to Moscow, some of which preceded Trump's arrival on the political scene ... Trump's popularity has only encouraged other Republicans to adopt a soft-gloves approach to Russia.
- ^ Ball, Molly. How Trump Turned Conservatives Against Helping Ukraine. The Wall Street Journal. February 23, 2024 [February 28, 2024]. (原始内容存档于2024-09-26).
- ^ Lange, Jason. Trump's rise sparks isolationist worries abroad, but voters unfazed. Reuters. January 17, 2024 [January 17, 2024].
- ^ Swan, Jonathan; Savage, Charlie; Haberman, Maggie. Fears of a NATO Withdrawal Rise as Trump Seeks a Return to Power. New York Times. December 9, 2023 [December 10, 2023]. (原始内容存档于2023-12-10).
- ^ Baker, Peter. Favoring Foes Over Friends, Trump Threatens to Upend International Order. The New York Times. February 11, 2024 [February 21, 2024]. ISSN 1553-8095. (原始内容存档于2024-02-20) (英语).
- ^ Cohn, Nate. The 6 Kinds of Republican Voters. The New York Times. August 17, 2023 [October 9, 2023]. ISSN 0362-4331. (原始内容存档于October 12, 2023) (美国英语).
- ^ Collinson, Stephen. McCarthy became the latest victim of Trump's extreme GOP revolution. CNN. 2023-10-04 [2023-12-31]. (原始内容存档于2023-12-31).
- ^ Rocha, Alander. Mike Rogers says of 'far-right wing' of GOP: 'You can't get rid of them'. AL. 2023-09-07 [2023-12-31]. (原始内容存档于2024-09-11).
- ^ Macpherson, James. Far right tugs at North Dakota Republican Party. AP News. 2021-07-24 [2023-12-31]. (原始内容存档于2024-09-13).
- ^ Fringe activists threaten Georgia GOP's political future. The Times Herald. 2023-05-15 [2023-12-31]. (原始内容存档于2024-09-11).
- ^ Baker, Paula; Critchlow, Donald T. The Oxford Handbook of American Political History. Oxford University Press. 2020: 387 [April 23, 2021]. ISBN 978-0190628697. (原始内容存档于December 15, 2023) –通过Google Books.
Contemporary debate is fueled on one side by immigration restrictionists, led by President Donald Trump and other elected republicans, whose rhetorical and policy assaults on undocumented Latin American immigrants, Muslim refugees, and family-based immigration energized their conservative base.
- ^ Jones, Kent. Populism, Trade, and Trump's Path to Victory. Populism and Trade: The Challenge to the Global Trading System. Oxford University Press. 2021. ISBN 978-0190086350.
- ^ Smith, Jordan Michael; Logis, Rich; Logis, Rich; Shephard, Alex; Shephard, Alex; Kipnis, Laura; Kipnis, Laura; Haas, Lidija; Haas, Lidija. The Neocons Are Losing. Why Aren't We Happy?. The New Republic. October 17, 2022 [May 5, 2023]. ISSN 0028-6583. (原始内容存档于May 5, 2023).
- ^ Arias-Maldonado, Manuel. Sustainability in the Anthropocene: Between Extinction and Populism. Sustainability. January 2020, 12 (6): 2538. ISSN 2071-1050. doi:10.3390/su12062538 (英语).
- ^ Spiegeleire, Stephan De; Skinner, Clarissa; Sweijs, Tim. The Rise of Populist Sovereignism: What It Is, Where It Comes From, and What It Means for International Security and Defense. The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies. 2017. ISBN 978-94-92102-59-1.
- ^ Isaac, Jeffrey. Making America Great Again?. Perspectives on Politics (Cambridge University Press). November 2017, 15 (3): 625–631. doi:10.1017/S1537592717000871 .
- ^ Blum, Rachel M. & Cowburn, Mike. How Local Factions Pressure Parties: Activist Groups and Primary Contests in the Tea Party Era. British Journal of Political Science (Cambridge University Press). 2024, 54 (1): 88–109 [2023-12-31]. doi:10.1017/S0007123423000224. (原始内容存档于2024-09-11).
- ^ Johnson, Lauren R.; McCray, Deon; Ragusa, Jordan M. #NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party's nominee in the 2016 presidential election. Research & Politics. January 11, 2018, 5 (1). doi:10.1177/2053168017749383 (英语).
- ^ Swartz, David L. Trump divide among American conservative professors. Theory & Society. 27 May 2022, 52 (5): 739–769. ISSN 1573-7853. PMC 10224651 . PMID 37362148. doi:10.1007/s11186-023-09517-4 (英语).
- ^ Jeffrey M. Jones. Wyoming, Mississippi, Utah Rank as Most Conservative States. 盖洛普. 2010-08-02 [2024-02-17].
- ^ Donald T. Critchlow. The Conservative Ascendancy: How the Republican Right Rose to Power in Modern America. University Press of Kansas. 2011 [2024-02-17]. ISBN 9780700617951.
- ^ Joel D. Aberbach; Gillian Peele (编). Crisis of Conservatism?: The Republican Party, the Conservative Movement, and American Politics After Bush. Oxford University Press. 2011: 105. ISBN 9780199831364.
- ^ Bernie Becker. Trump’s 6 populist positions. 政客. 2016-02-13 [2024-02-17]. (原始内容存档于2019-10-31).
- ^ William Curtis Martin. With God on Our Side: The Rise of the Religious Right in America 2nd Edition. Broadway Books. 1996 [2024-02-17]. ISBN 9780553067491.
- ^ Philip Shabecoff. Earth Rising: American Environmentalism in the 21st Century 2nd Edition. Island Press. 2000: 125 [2024-02-17]. ISBN 9781559635837.
- ^ Samuel P. Hays. A History of Environmental Politics Since 1945. University of Pittsburgh Press. 2000: 119 [2024-02-17]. ISBN 9780822972242.
- ^ Christopher Sellers. How Republicans came to embrace anti-environmentalism. Vox. 2017-06-07 [2024-02-17]. (原始内容存档于2017-11-02).
- ^ Riley E. Dunlap; Araon M. McCright. A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2008, 50 (5): 26–35. doi:10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35.
- ^ Sondre Båtstrand. More than Markets: A Comparative Study of Nine Conservative Parties on Climate Change. Politics & Policy. 2015-08, 43 (4): 538–561. doi:10.1111/polp.12122.
- ^ 65.0 65.1 Jonathan Chait. Why Are Republicans the Only Climate-Science-Denying Party in the World?. 纽约. 2015-09-27 [2024-02-18]. (原始内容存档于2024-02-11).
Of all the major conservative parties in the democratic world, the Republican Party stands alone in its denial of the legitimacy of climate science. Indeed, the Republican Party stands alone in its conviction that no national or international response to climate change is needed. To the extent that the party is divided on the issue, the gap separates candidates who openly dismiss climate science as a hoax, and those who, shying away from the political risks of blatant ignorance, instead couch their stance in the alleged impossibility of international action.
- ^ 66.0 66.1 Edward Ashbee; Alex Waddan. US Republicans and the New Fusionism. 政治季刊. 2023-12-13. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.13341.
- ^ The growing peril of national conservatism. 经济学人. 2024-02-15 [2024-02-18]. (原始内容存档于2024-02-15).
- ^ The Republican Party no longer believes America is the essential nation. 经济学人. 2023-10-26 [2024-02-18]. (原始内容存档于2024-02-13).
延伸阅读
- Michael Barone; Richard E. Cohen. The Almanac of American Politics 2010. National Journal Group. 2009. ISBN 9780892341191.
- Peter Baker; Susan Glasser. The Divider: Trump in the White House, 2017-2021. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. 2022-09-20. ISBN 9780385546546.
- John David Dyche. Republican Leader: A Political Biography of Senator Mitch McConnell. ISI Books. 2009. ISBN 9781935191599.
- Thomas B. Edsall. Building Red America: The New Conservative Coalition and the Drive for Permanent Power. Basic Books. 2006-08. ISBN 9780465018154.
- Michael Crane (编). The Political Junkie Handbook. S.P.I. Books. 2004.
- Thomas Frank. What's the Matter with Kansas?. Picador. 2005-05. ISBN 9780805077742.
- Bruce Frohnen; Jeffrey O. Nelson; Jeremy Beer (编). American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia. ISI Books. 2006. ISBN 9781932236446.
- Tom Hamburger; Peter Wallsten. One Party Country: The Republican Plan for Dominance in the 21st Century. Wiley. 2006-07-18. ISBN 9780471776727.
- Nicole Hemmer. Partisans: The Conservative Revolutionaries Who Remade American Politics in the 1990s. Basic Books. 2022-08-30. ISBN 9781541646872.
- Hugh Hewitt. GOP 5.0: Republican Renewal Under President Obama. XULON Press. 2009-01-15. ISBN 9781607911555.
- John Micklethwait; Adrian Wooldridge. The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America. Penguin Press. 2004-05. ISBN 9781594200205.
- Richard Morin; Claudia Deane. Belief Spectrum Brings Party Splits. Washington Post (The Washington Post Company). 1998-10-04: A1 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2021-02-02).